nw

New Delhi: In the Ayodhya case, the Supreme Court has dismissed all the reconsideration petitions. Chief Justice SA Bobde, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice S Abdul Nazeer and Justice Sanjeev Khanna ruled on it. After consideration, 5 judges have found that the petitions are not fit for hearing in open court. No such thing has been said in these, which was not answered in the November 9 decision. The apex court, in its judgment pronounced on November 9, had said to give the disputed land for the construction of Ram temple. Along with this, the court had issued a directive to Muslim parties to give five acres of land for construction of mosque at some other place in Ayodhya. The hearing in the Supreme Court Chamber began at 1:40 pm. A total of 18 reconsideration petitions have been filed in the apex court in connection with the November 9 verdict. Most of these petitions are from Muslim parties dissatisfied with the verdict. Nirmohi Akhada also filed a review petiti

Ayodhya Case: Iqbal Ansari said: Court decision on the Ram Janmabhoomi controversy Kubool, Saints flare Ayodhya, Supreme Court in Uttar Pradesh, on the Ram Janmabhoomi controversy today, after the adjournment of the next hearing on January 29, the Saint is a bit distraught, but the Babri Masjid leader Iqbal Ansari is very satisfied. He said that even though this big decision is taking some time, but whatever decision the court decides we will be disqualified. After the adjournment of Ram Janmabhoomi Babri Masjid's hearing till January 29, Babri Masjid's Iqbal Ansari said that the hearing was to start from today, for some reasons the date of hearing has been extended. He said that the court decides on the basis of the evidence and the decision that will be decided court will be considered. He said that pressure on the court is not appropriate. Unlike the anxieties of Ram temple supporters, Babar Masjid's party leader Mohammad Iqbal said there should be no pressure on the cou