nw

New Delhi: In the Ayodhya case, the Supreme Court has dismissed all the reconsideration petitions. Chief Justice SA Bobde, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice S Abdul Nazeer and Justice Sanjeev Khanna ruled on it. After consideration, 5 judges have found that the petitions are not fit for hearing in open court. No such thing has been said in these, which was not answered in the November 9 decision. The apex court, in its judgment pronounced on November 9, had said to give the disputed land for the construction of Ram temple. Along with this, the court had issued a directive to Muslim parties to give five acres of land for construction of mosque at some other place in Ayodhya. The hearing in the Supreme Court Chamber began at 1:40 pm. A total of 18 reconsideration petitions have been filed in the apex court in connection with the November 9 verdict. Most of these petitions are from Muslim parties dissatisfied with the verdict. Nirmohi Akhada also filed a review petiti

After the Supreme Court's decision on the Ayodhya case, the 81-year-old woman of Jabalpur city will receive food after 27 years. All these years she was supported only by milk and fruits. Till the Ram Janmabhoomi dispute was resolved, the woman resolved not to take food. A member of the woman's family said that after the verdict of the apex court on the Ayodhya case came on Saturday, the way for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya was cleared. Now, to break their fast, a Udayapan (religious deeds performed at the end of the fast etc.) will be done soon. Vivek Chaturvedi, son of fasting woman Urmila Chaturvedi, claimed on Sunday that my mother had been on a diet of fruits and milk for 27 years. He is very happy to hear the verdict of the top court in the Ayodhya case. She is 87 Yrs Old Urmila Chaturvedi who is Fasting eating fruits for one time in a day since last 27 Yrs on Sankalp for #RamMandir . Those who were shouting "Ram Mandir banjayega to my hoga", they